November 3, 2025
SEO isn’t dead, it just grew up: understanding AEO, AIO and GEOHow search, AI and generative engines changed the rules , and what that means for your content.
Every few weeks, a new list of “LinkedIn best practices” makes the rounds.
Post a carousel. End with a question. Add a comment CTA. Break your text into one-line paragraphs. Include emojis. Use a hook. Avoid links. Use links. Tag no one. Tag two people. Never tag. Always tag.
You get the idea.
It’s tempting to treat these like a checklist. Especially when you’re time-poor and just want your posts to do something.
But I wanted to know what actually holds up beyond the recycled advice. So I ran an experiment.
Over the course of a week, I tested the most common LinkedIn “growth hacks” I see:
Each post was written to match these patterns, but still rooted in something I’d normally talk about. I wasn’t just writing rubbish.
The goal? See whether form really beats function.
Here’s how each post performed on impressions:
These are some of my lowest-performing posts in months.
(For reference: my average post gets 1,000–4,000 impressions. The one right after this test hit over 4,000.)
Here’s what I think is going on.
Format might boost visibility, but it doesn’t carry the content.
If the idea isn’t interesting, relevant, or different, no carousel or emoji spacing can save it.
Takeaway: Your post needs to earn attention on its own. No hack will rescue something generic.
The more your post resembles the last 20 posts someone saw that day, the easier it is to scroll past.
Ironically, the hacks that are meant to increase reach might be making your content blend in. Not stand out.
Takeaway: Sounding like yourself is a better differentiator than any post format.
Comment CTAs. Leading questions. Artificial hooks. These work when they fit the post. But when they’re tacked on for the sake of reach, they feel forced.
I had posts that were technically structured “correctly”, but didn’t invite real conversation.
Takeaway: Engagement metrics don’t matter if they don’t lead to relevance, relationships, or results.
The one post that outperformed all of these? A simple, useful insight, written the way I normally write. No fancy hook. No formatting trick. Just something that clicked with the people I wanted to reach.
Takeaway: Helpful, human content > hacky, optimised content. Every time.
If you’re a founder, marketer, or expert trying to build visibility on LinkedIn, here’s the real lesson:
You don’t need to optimise for the algorithm.
You need to optimise for understanding. And resonance. And relevance.
Some practical things to try instead:
The post that performed best that week was the one that sounded like me.
I shared a clear point of view, in a natural voice, on a topic that mattered to the people I write for.
It wasn’t optimised. It was real.
That’s what got people to stop, read, and respond.
(And yep, it led to client conversations, too.)
👋 Want your LinkedIn content to work like that?
This is what I help clients do, through ghostwriting, strategy, and content retainers that make your voice clear, consistent, and actually worth reading.

November 3, 2025
SEO isn’t dead, it just grew up: understanding AEO, AIO and GEOHow search, AI and generative engines changed the rules , and what that means for your content.
October 30, 2025
If I were starting with too much content: how I’d turn volume into valueHere’s the step-by-step approach I’d take to audit, refine, and rebuild your content system so every piece works harder for visibility and conversion.
October 30, 2025
The 5 content foundations every B2B SaaS business needsIf buyers can’t explain what your product does, they can’t buy it. Discover the five foundational content topics every SaaS business needs to build visibility, trust, and demand.